Mappes Article Sexual Morality Essay

In the short article Sexual Morality and the Concept of development Another Person by Thomas Mappes, there argon several points that he makes about what should be considered morally right or wrong. Mappes sticks to trinity main points when it comes to what he considers morally right or wrong. These three cases are using some other person, deception of one by another, and coercion. both(prenominal) three points basically revolve around how he feels that it is wrong for one person to in whatever way shape or form to use another person for inner interaction. He bases this viewpoint around the conventional sexual morality which outlines that sex without love is immoral.I cannot theorise that I all in all agree or disagree with his points that are made. This is not because I cannot cop what he is trying to say but rather because I feel that there are m any(prenominal) other view points to see this topic through. Firstly he talks about using another person in which he describes t hat it is wrong for one person to use another person merely as means. This is the general background of his entire article. Though I do agree it is wrong for one person to use another person merely as sexual means, I see many situations in which both parties are using each other for the same thing. Not to have a further interaction or relationship after the matter. Mappes declares that A immorally uses B if and only if A intentionally acts in a way that violates the requirement that Bs involvement with As ends be based on Bs Voluntary informed consent.This basically means that if someone is to have sexual social intercourse with another person then both people must agree to the others conditions as well as respect the others wishes. However in the point I made before, there are times that both parties are using each other for the same thing. In which case does it really matter if both party is completely honest with the other? The reason this is important is because if both parti es want to have sexual intercourse with the other and have no other intentions with the other person, do they need to have a more in-depth relationship? Secondly he talks about deception of one person by another, in this he speaks about several different ways one could deceive another. In any which case, he views it as immoral to do so.Finally he voices his opinion about Coercion, in this case coercion is basically a complex word for rape.